<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes on Popular Re-emergence of Sub-1GHz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dash7.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dash7.org/blog/?p=131</link>
	<description>long range, low power wireless sensor networking now available</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:45:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PatBurns</title>
		<link>http://dash7.org/blog/?p=131&#038;cpage=1#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>PatBurns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dash7.org/blog/?p=131#comment-450</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to argue with 433 MHz, unless you are streaming video/audio, which DASH7 does not purport to do regardless.  The &quot;discovery&quot; of 433MHz is happening across many industries right now ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to argue with 433 MHz, unless you are streaming video/audio, which DASH7 does not purport to do regardless.  The &#8220;discovery&#8221; of 433MHz is happening across many industries right now &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://dash7.org/blog/?p=131&#038;cpage=1#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dash7.org/blog/?p=131#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Correction to content above:

Our new WSN company is releasing 900Mhz WS but we’re moving quickly to sub 900Mhz as we see opportunity there vs competing in the 2.4Ghz space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction to content above:</p>
<p>Our new WSN company is releasing 900Mhz WS but we’re moving quickly to sub 900Mhz as we see opportunity there vs competing in the 2.4Ghz space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://dash7.org/blog/?p=131&#038;cpage=1#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dash7.org/blog/?p=131#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Any chance you guys could do a white paper on this topic?

Having built and sold a successful wireless company (MaxStream) we always struggled with the argument that the 2.4GHz space was a crowded. And while we supported the proprietary and Zigbee methods with our radios, we always pushed the 900Mhz and 868Mhz frequencies over 2.4Ghz because they performed better.  Once we explained the challenges to customers, I&#039;d say we moved 70% of our customer base to 900Mhz and received no complaints from them once the netowrks were installed.

Our new WSN company is releasing 900Mhz WS but we&#039;re moving quickly to sub 1GHz as we see opportunity there vs trying competing in the 2.4Ghz space.

Give some thought to a white paper.  Good fodder for discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance you guys could do a white paper on this topic?</p>
<p>Having built and sold a successful wireless company (MaxStream) we always struggled with the argument that the 2.4GHz space was a crowded. And while we supported the proprietary and Zigbee methods with our radios, we always pushed the 900Mhz and 868Mhz frequencies over 2.4Ghz because they performed better.  Once we explained the challenges to customers, I&#8217;d say we moved 70% of our customer base to 900Mhz and received no complaints from them once the netowrks were installed.</p>
<p>Our new WSN company is releasing 900Mhz WS but we&#8217;re moving quickly to sub 1GHz as we see opportunity there vs trying competing in the 2.4Ghz space.</p>
<p>Give some thought to a white paper.  Good fodder for discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wireless Sensor Networks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Back down to Sub-1GHz ?</title>
		<link>http://dash7.org/blog/?p=131&#038;cpage=1#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Wireless Sensor Networks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Back down to Sub-1GHz ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dash7.org/blog/?p=131#comment-86</guid>
		<description>[...] Full text of the post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full text of the post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
